Throughout history, humans constantly wipe out various animals and plants by means of expanding towns and cities, continually extract natural resources in a toxic and destructive manner, and continuously generate lots of pollution and waste. These actions create scarcity of natural resources and good real estate, and scarcity promotes disputes and wars. An increasing population of dumber people generates more social dysfunctions (e.g., irresponsible procreation, broken families, more anti-social behaviors, higher crime rates, more frequent and severe corruption, lower economic productivity, inadequate hygiene and sanitation, higher rates of illnesses, inferior academics, backward science and engineering, and reckless acts of desperation).
The big problem with Prince William’s speech is that he is a major part of the problem, but he refuses to fully admit this and develop the appropriate solutions. He and his royal relatives live very luxurious lifestyles or enjoy extremely high per-capita consumption. Their lavishly decorated mansions; large real estates; luxury vehicles; exotic cars; boats and yachts; private airplanes; coterie of various assistants, ghost writers, editors, nannies, maids, cooks, chefs, butlers, chauffeurs, private guards, legal advisers, accountants, public relations managers, tutors, gardeners, repairmen, and other servants require the extraction of massive quantities and wide varieties of natural resources; mass production of various tools and foods; the accumulation of landfills; and the military industrial complex to perpetuate their political and economic powers. Prince William’s wealthy and socially connected peers hunt endangered animals around the world, because they think hunting rare animals is a sign of manliness, exceptional technique with firearms, warrior skills, and other egotistical fantasies. The ruling class boasts of their riches and privileges, while telling everyone else to live with less.
According to Zionist Western economics, property rights should prevent excessive environmental destruction. The idea claims the average person dislikes environmental degradation, thus, the average person will reject environmental degradation. However, this idea is unrealistic. Many people are irresponsible or incompetent. Lots of people lack the talent and/or education to understand national and international topics regarding toxicity, biology, ecosystems, legal and political systems, economics, central banking, science and engineering, etc. Western corporations and governments have a long history of fabricating enormous masses of pollution and waste in the form of industrial mass production, factory farms, the constant expansion of towns and cities, extremely destructive and hypocritical invasions of foreign lands, etc. Major corporations and governments have a long history of hypocrisy, such as prioritizing their property rights over other entities’ property rights. This is the foundation behind America’s nonstop search for explosive liberations, humanitarian shootouts, double-standard anti-terrorism, counterfeit war on drugs, dumb-mock-crazy revolutions, proxy rebels, and proxy regimes around the world. The details of this problem vary from location to location, but it is international.
Brazil is a highly multicultural nation that was founded upon European colonial empires. Modern Brazil claims to be a multicultural success, but, in reality, Brazil frequently suffers various disputes and conflicts concerning cultural dissimilarities, the wealth gap, crime, corruption, overpopulation, etc. Brazilian corporations and government agencies have a long history of violating the property rights and human rights of Native Americans: “Indigenous Tribe Prepared to Fight to Defend Amazon From Brazilian Mining” (https://www.activistpost.com/2017/11/indigenous-tribe-prepared-to-fight-to-defend-amazon-from-brazilian-mining.html). Brazil’s large and growing population needs lots of natural resources and real estate for housing, transportation, businesses, farms, landfills, and technology. Thus, Brazil’s corporations and government agencies continually exploit the natural environment that is Brazil’s rain forest, which has been inhabited by Native Americans for many thousands of years. Native Americans tend to have much smaller populations with much smaller consumption rates. Thus, Native Americans are much less likely to damage the natural environment. However, Native Americans’ low-tech lifestyles put them at a huge disadvantage when the situation involves limited warfare to all-out warfare.
Based on some studies, the deforestation of rain forests in Brazil and other parts of the world is unsustainable. With current technology (and average intelligence around the world), the world lacks the natural resources to supply a relatively wealthy American way-of-life to everyone on this planet of 7+ billion persons. However, Zionist Western propaganda and agitprop insist high consumption is the true path to enlightenment, nirvana, success, happiness, Holiness, human rights, etc.
Overpopulation plus its excessive consumption and pollution could be solved by peaceful and customized solutions for peculiar individuals and unique communities, humane eugenics (e.g., allowing smarter, fitter, and more attractive people to have more children), balancing the birth rate and death rate so that human populations are based on the replacement of previous generations and not on net-total growth, expansion of humanity into the infinity of outer space, lifestyle habits and technologies that are more efficient, etc.
Once again, a Muslim terrorist, Sayfullo Saipov, from the Middle Eastern region (or Africa) used a large vehicle to murder and injure many people at New York City. The terrorist wrote he was motivated by ISIS. The terrorists are almost always Muslims from the medieval Islamic Middle East and/or the perpetually primitive Africa. The Middle East and Africa have lots of natural resources. NATO members have a long history of supporting proxy rebels and proxy regimes in the Middle East and Africa (e.g., Israel, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Iran, Afghanistan, Nigeria, Conga, Rwanda, South Africa, Somalia, Kenya, Niger, and Mozambique). NATO members have a long history of extracting natural resources from the Middle East and Africa by using proxy wars. NATO members insist they are explosively liberating the Middle East and Africa.
ISIS was created during the US military operations for anti-terrorism and humanitarian liberation in Iraq and Syria. ISIS was supposedly unstoppable in Iraq and Syria. Then Russia conducted major military operations in Syria to reverse the expansion of ISIS in Syria and to maintain the Assad regime in Syria. Then the US provided more military support to the Iraq government. Then ISIS began retreating in Iraq. There is evidence that the mysterious rise of ISIS was secretly aided by the US, some European nations, Saudi Arabia, Israel, and Turkey. ISIS was suppose to overthrow the Assad regime and break up Iraq into smaller and more manageable sectors. This plan is similar to NATO’s humanitarian shootouts in Libya. The difference was that Libya had no major ally, and Syria has the support of Russia.
During Trump’s presidential campaign, Trump boasted he was the anti-war candidate. However, the Trump presidency plans to prolong and expand the global war on terrorism: “Unlimited War: Tillerson, Mattis ask for global fight against terrorism” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlPJbOmyfqY). Trump and the rest of the US corporate-government refuse to admit their military solution is an extremely inefficient method to solve scarcity of natural resources around the world.
After the New York City terrorism by a Muslim Middle Easterner, Trump concluded this terrorism justified higher standards for immigration, which is true. America should amend the US Constitution so that the US government differentiates between (a) immigrants who will respect the US Constitution and have the potential to become US citizens, and (b) immigrants who provide cheap labor, want emergency aid, and/or are incompatible with the US Constitution. However, after the Las Vegas mass shooting by a white guy, Trump did not argue for stricter standards for gun usage or firearms ownership. Instead, Trump insisted the violent tragedy should not be used to politicize the US Constitution’s Second Amendment. If we could create better immigration standards, then we could create better standards for gun usage.
Guns should be required to have identification like vehicles. Guns should be safely stored and maintained. Gun ownership data should be maintained by the government. Guns should be only used by competent and law-abiding people, and this should be repeatedly confirmed by government tests (which is similar to driving privileges).
Anyhow, a major cause of Islamic terrorism is international migration, which is driven by global trade. Global trade exists, because every modern community needs access to a wide variety of natural resources that are found throughout the world. The Middle East has a very high concentration of liquid and gaseous hydrocarbon fuels. America and Europe have a high per-capita consumption of liquid and gaseous hydrocarbon fuels. America secures its access to Middle Eastern natural resources by creating various deals (e.g., the petrodollar’s inflation tax, cartels, and sanctions) with rebels and regimes in the Middle East. However, lots of Middle Easterners do not like these deals, but these deals are enforced by threats and violence. Thus, some Middle Easterners use terrorism (i.e., unlawful violence to control society) to disrupt or cancel these deals.
Decades of the war on terror have failed to stop terrorism. In fact, the war on terror has increased terrorism. When the established powers legally impose their one-sided standards upon others, they are motivating more independent-minded commoners to be more indignant and more rebellious. Eventually, some of these independent-minded commoners resort to unlawful violence to try to achieve their social changes.
Terrorism should be solved by various methods: the development of peaceful and customized solutions for peculiar individuals and unique communities, humane eugenics to improve the quality of people or society, management of population growth to minimize scarcity that promotes arguments and fights, exploiting the seemingly infinite resources of outer space, and efficient usage of natural resources from extraction to manufacturing to disposal and recycling. Violent solutions should be a last resort.
In the real world, efficiency is the only widespread solution for the insatiable demands of global economics, which worships high per-capita consumption and/or high community consumption, which refuses to recognize the increasing dangers of overpopulation, which fails to understand genetic regression-to-the-mean, and which believes in the democratic myth of one-size-fits-all solutions in a world filled with diverse cultures. Efficiency is best enhanced by science and engineering.
A very determined minority of people believe fully or partially electric vehicles are the future for ground transportation, even though batteries require toxic mining, toxic mass production, toxic recycling or disposal, and mainly obtain energy from power-plants that burn hydrocarbon fuels. In addition, the combustion of hydrocarbon fuels still has room for major improvements.
Mazda is developing a combustion engine that combines the benefits of both petrol/gasoline spark combustion (e.g., the lower pollution, higher horsepower, and faster engine revolutions of petrol/gasoline engines) and diesel compression combustion (e.g., the farther mileage and larger torque of diesel engines). Here’s the video summary of Mazda’s Spark Controlled Compression Ignition (SPCCI): “Next Generation Gasoline Engine SKYACTIV-X: SPCCI” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBlBrxT-Xy4). Here’s is an article about the engine plus better designs for suspensions and seats: “Mazda Next-Generation Technology -- Press Information” (https://insidemazda.mazdausa.com/press-release/mazda-next-generation-technology-press-information/). Mazda hopes to mass produce this engine by 2020. See below for a summary of Mazda’s new engine technology.
A petrol/gasoline engine uses a spark to ignite the gasoline-air mixture, and this combustion shoves away the engine piston, which is connected to the connecting rod. Then the connecting rod shoves the S-shaped crankshaft in a circular direction. The crankshaft connects to other parts of the car (e.g., transmission and wheels) to move the car forward and backward. A diesel engine uses high compression to ignite the diesel-air mixture, and this combustion shoves the engine piston.
A spark ignition has a combustion with a spreading effect. The small point of the spark ignition starts the localized combustion of the gasoline-air mixture. Then the combustion spreads to the rest of the gasoline-air mixture. A compression combustion uses high pressure of the fuel-air mixture to simultaneously burn the entire volume of the fuel-air mixture. This means a spark combustion has a weaker and longer lasting effect, but a compression combustion has a more intense and brief effect.
Multiple pistons work together so that one piston decompresses while another piston compresses. This decompression-compression creates a constant and circular movement, which could be measured by revolutions per minute (rpm), horsepower (e.g., speed of applied energy), and torque (e.g., amount of applied energy).
In the past, engineers from various corporations and universities in various nations tried to use high compression to ignite a gasoline-air mixture in order to obtain the benefits of gasoline fuel and diesel fuel, but this technique only works at low revolutions per minute (rpm). At higher rpm, the technique runs into crippling problems with the timing of high compression, fuel injection, and pollution removal. Another failed solution was using high compression combustion of a gasoline-air mixture at lower rpm, and spark ignition of gasoline-air mixture at higher rpm. This second solution required overly complex transitions from high-compression combustion to spark combustion and back-and-forth.
Mazda’s newly developed solution, which is called Spark Controlled Compression Ignition (SPCCI), uses both compression combustion and spark ignition during each fuel burn and all revolutions. The piston compresses the gasoline-air mixture to a high pressure that is just below the pressure for compression combustion. Then the spark ignition starts the combustion of the gasoline-air mixture. When this combustion spreads, it increases the surrounding pressure and heat. This increasing and spreading pressure creates a compression combustion. Thus, the spark combustion is reinforced by a compression combustion. This dual combustion creates more energy at any rpm. More energy with the same amount of fuel equals higher mileage or better efficiency.
Mazda’s Spark Controlled Compression Ignition (SPCCI) was installed in a prototype 2.0-liter engine that is called SkyActiv-X. This engine generates 10 to 30 percent more torque, 20 to 30 percent more fuel economy, and an rpm that matches current spark-combustion piston-engines (which is ~1,000 to ~6,500 rpm). This efficient technology could significantly and factually (1) improve the quality of life for people and (2) slow down the destruction of natural environments. On the other hand, pompous speeches by Prince William and other ruling parasites are tantamount to voodoo magic.